Souljer wrote:How much would a R100S that might be in decent shape but need tranny work be worth? What is the mileage, does it run, etc.?
That's a tough question to answer, for me anyhow. Plus I'm not up on current airhead values. The answer has to depend on condition and the "story" that goes with the bike. But you do have a big part of the story in that the transmission "needs work". The transmission can only be fixed or replaced. Used airhead transmissions are increasingly rare, but they can be had. Unfortunately airhead transmissions are "prone" to failure. Say about 10 years ago a used transmission could be had on the IMBMWR want ads for, say, $600 to $1,000. And what you get is a transmission that may or may not be "good". So, it is a gamble unless you have a particular reason to trust the seller (friend of a friend, etc.). My WAG would be that the current "value" of such a transmission would be in the $1,000 to $2,000 range. And Ebay would probably be higher.
Airhead transmissions can still be repaired, and there are trusted repairmen around. The chief concern would be whether the cluster gear is in good shape since it is no longer available, and I haven't heard of anybody making that particular item. I broke the cluster gear in my '77 R100/7 transmission over 20 years ago, and was able to readily find another. But that was over 20 years ago. Today you still will be able to find a used or rebuilt transmission, but the price will be higher.
Where I'm headed with all this transmission talk is that if and when you buy the '77 R100S you should mentally add about $2,000 to the purchase price. ($1,000 more if you hire somebody to do the swap.) If that works for you I would say go for it.
But there are more things to be considered other than the transmission (which I've made so much of). The first thing is how stock is the bike? Modifications do little to enhance the market value, no matter how sexy they are. Having said that, if the bike has mods and they turn your crank, go for it. I'm just saying that (in my opinion) mods don't enhance the MARKET value.
If you find a bike that particularly interests you, I would suggest posting the particulars along with some pics right here on Boxerworks. The collective knowledge on this board is damned good and we can likely tell you a lot of things about the bike that you might not notice.
FYI, I have a '77 R100S that I bought roughly 20 years ago. It is my favorite airhead. I have also spent significant seat time on a '77 R100/7 and a '76 R75/6. The reason I bring this up is that the airhead "charm" isn't limited to the S and RS bikes. In fact my '77 R100 S bike rides and feels much the same as my '77 R100/7. The S bike has a bit more power than my /7 but both "scoot" nicely. I certainly don't miss (or for that matter notice) the power when I'm on my /7. The R75/6, on the other hand is way down on power compared to the bigger bikes, but it still is a fun ride. The lower power means I have to "wring the bike's neck" if I want to fly briskly. And that is a joy in and of itself. It forces you to pay attention to the bike and escalate the RPMs (since you don't have the R100 torque to get you up to speed.)
Finally (at last) may I suggest that the S bikes and the RS bikes have an emotional "patina of desirability" that I think isn't exactly warrented. For example, the 77 R100S is regarded by most as being the acme of all R100S bikes. The 78 R100S has (IIRC) some cam timing differences, but is otherwise the same engine. In the same vein the '77 R100RS, generally speaking, is even more desirable than the R100S. I believe the '77 S and RS engines are identical except that some of the '77 RS bikes have a 40mm exhaust as opposed to the standard 38mm exhaust. I can't say for sure, but I reckon that a '77 RS with 40mm pipes will fetch substantially more money than a '77 RS with the smaller pipes.
(I've been pretty free with dollar values in the above. Others here may have better figures in mind.)
Ramble over. Hope this helps a bit.
Ken