4 valve heads, back again.

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
User avatar
vanzen
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:29 pm
Location: Hidin' in the Hills

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by vanzen »

BMWARCHER wrote:I aquired a set years ago but have been reluctant to install them based on comments at Luftmeister about the spring pressures and inertia forces flattening the cam lobes and then ruining the oil pump rotor surfaces. Still need rings and plugs for them. Any good sources for Krauser spares in the US?

These "problems" have been addressed by the "K4V Specific" cam profiles and a more robust front cam carrier.
The only source of remaining replacement parts that I know of
is in the Netherlands at de Hobbyist

Pistons were typically provided by Mahle (Artikel # 2K 31 657),
so that may be a possible source for rings –
Don't you got a plug to cross-reference ?
Image
User avatar
DanielMc
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 10:17 am
Location: England

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by DanielMc »

Just curious as I'm unlikely to ever be able to get a set, but what sort of performance increase would a pair of these give to a 1000cc engine assuming everything else was left standard?
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers might not be able to tell the difference." Samuel Clemens
chasbmw
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:40 am
Location: Bath UK

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by chasbmw »

I saw a cycle world review of Krausers on a early 80s R100. It included dyno charts and I seem to remember that the power recorded just about cracked 60 bhp at the rear wheel. Quite a good increase from a typical R100 of around 50 bhp.

However to put this into context you could get 60 bhp from the r100 with a tuning package that would be cheaper than the krausers and by many accounts be a bit more reliable.
Charles
Charles
Image
Replica 1070 R90/S (based on 82 RT)
1975 R90/6
User avatar
vanzen
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:29 pm
Location: Hidin' in the Hills

K4V: 18.5% HP & ...

Post by vanzen »

Cycle magazine, July 1983:

"The dyno explained it all. The kit adds an additional 18.5 percent horsepower.
But more significant, both for street performance and our roll-on tests,
is the Krauser's imposing torque spread.
The K(4V)-bike BMW has more torque between 3,000 and 6,500 rpm
than a stocker has at it's peak.
The engine's strongest torque lies between 3,500 and 5,500 rpm
where it remains above 52 pound feet, about 15 percent
on the average more than a stocker*
..."


* my emphasis, as this will be the more important gain, IMO.

Early K4V kits did have some teething problems.
Many of these were addressed by Krauser throughout the short course of production.
(BMW's introduction of the K-bike relegated the kit to history.)

The K4V kit's biggest fault might have been Luftmeister's nefarious advertising
which led the consumer to believe that these kits were a "plug-n-play" item.
They were not !
The "misunderstanding" made K4Vs unpopular in the states
even as they were used, raced, and further developed in Europe.

Disregarding the definite torque advantage,
I'm not convinced that 60 HP at the rear wheel
could be bought or built in 1983 for $1,500 –
the cost of the K4V kit at that time.
Image
Garnet
Posts: 3108
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:24 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by Garnet »

"The K(4V)-bike BMW has more torque between 3,000 and 6,500 rpm
than a stocker has at it's peak.
The engine's strongest torque lies between 3,500 and 5,500 rpm
where it remains above 52 pound feet, about 15 percent
on the average more than a stocker* ..."


And that is realy what you feel on the "Butt Dyno".

It will be intersting to see if they sell, currently at $1300.
Garnet

Image
User avatar
vanzen
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:29 pm
Location: Hidin' in the Hills

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by vanzen »

Garnet wrote: And that is realy what you feel on the "Butt Dyno".
IMO, torque rules on the street – ASAP will be a more legitimate pursuit than top speed.
Garnet wrote:It will be intersting to see if they sell, currently at $1300.
Reserve not met. If it sells – my bet will be at @ 3-times the current.
Image
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by Major Softie »

Yeah, that is always the advantage of 4v heads: large valve area for good high rpm breathing without losing high charge velocity at lower rpm for low rpm power.

If you cammed those heads for less peak HP than stock, you'd still probably have significantly more power at 4000 rpm than stock. 4V's rock, but it is easy to see how the conversion kits would put a lot more strain on lifters, and solid lifters are even more susceptible to damage with current oils. I would think that oil choice would become VERY important with those kits, even with modified ramps.
MS - out
Duane Ausherman
Posts: 6008
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:39 pm
Location: Galt California
Contact:

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by Duane Ausherman »

I had 4 vlave heads on a BMW motorcycle for a few years. It really had plenty of torque. I could put it in 4th gear, at idle and feather the clutch and pull away from a stop.

I think I remember that they were off of a 1964 1200 cc engine............. VW that is.
Ask the Indians what happens when you don't control immigration.
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by Chuey »

[quote="Duane Ausherman"]I had 4 vlave heads on a BMW motorcycle for a few years. It really had plenty of torque. I could put it in 4th gear, at idle and feather the clutch and pull away from a stop.

I think I remember that they were off of a 1964 1200 cc engine............. VW that is.[/quote

I'll soon have my 1200cc VW back. In the car, that is. It will be all hopped up. Well, stock other than bigger jugs...1385cc. All freshened up and with its thermostat, etc.

Chuey
sterob
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:16 pm

Re: 4 valve heads, back again.

Post by sterob »

A mate of mine has two MKM's and he wants a rear axle for one...S.Meyer couldn't help. If nothing pop's up I suppose he can get one made.

Sterob
Post Reply