Re: R65LS ergonomics...
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:48 pm
Thanks for all the input, very informative.
Current plan is to watch and wait. I think $4200 is way too much.
Current plan is to watch and wait. I think $4200 is way too much.
The ass end of them is different.dougie wrote:Other than the black colour, are R65 and R65LS mufflers the same???
Do you know if the R65 ones fit on the LS?justoneoftheguys wrote:The ass end of them is different.dougie wrote:Other than the black colour, are R65 and R65LS mufflers the same???
The LS mufflers are concave while the Std. R65 has the same shape used on Type 247's of the same period.
Here was a nice set of LS mufflers that just went for cheap on eBay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1982-198 ... 4cfa41d720
Here is a picture of my bike's OEM mufflers:
http://www.pbase.com/tomfarr/image/102577217/large
Yes, they fit (obviously). I hadn't noticed that when I looked at the pictures the first time.dougie wrote:Do you know if the R65 ones fit on the LS?
That LS I was considering looks to have non-stock (rounded) perhaps painted.
Thus to get the look of the original, without the poor life expectancy.justoneoftheguys wrote:
It is common to paint the standard mufflers (or aftermarket) with high-temp black paint.
justoneoftheguys wrote:It is in remarkable shape (as far as pictures go).dougie wrote:(And it's soooo pretty.)
The beautiful stock black exhaust is the hardest part to replace.
And not to start a tube vs. tubeless argument, but the LS wheels have the safety lip that snowflakes lack.
And the rear brake drum is a different diameter than the 'flakes. Some PO's have been known to accidentally install the wrong ones, resulting in poor(er) performance.